Feed

Why in news?

In October 2026, India’s household inflation crossed 6% for the first time in two years, touching the upper limit of the RBI’s legally mandated tolerance range.

This threshold matters legally: if average CPI inflation stays above 6% or below 2% for three consecutive quarters, the RBI is deemed to have failed its inflation-targeting mandate.

With economists warning inflation could stay elevated until June 2027, understanding what’s driving this surge has become critical for both policymakers and households.

What’s in Today’s Article?

• The RBI’s Inflation Mandate: Why 6% Matters
• Airfares: The Biggest Single Driver
• Chipflation: The Electronics Price Spiral
• Food Inflation: The Most Visible Squeeze
• Core Inflation: Why the Underlying Picture Is Also Worsening
• Inflation Is Not Just Rising — It’s Spreading Wider

The RBI’s Inflation Mandate: Why 6% Matters

• Inflation is measured via the Consumer Price Index (CPI).
• By law, the RBI must keep average CPI inflation within a 2-6% tolerance band.
• Breaching this band for three consecutive quarters constitutes a formal policy failure under the RBI’s mandate.
• Economists warned inflation is “likely to print above 6% until June 2027” — signalling a prolonged period of price pressure, not a one-off spike.

Airfares: The Biggest Single Driver

• Average airfares rose 43% in October compared to the same month last year.
• Among all 358 goods and services in the CPI basket, airfares recorded the single largest month-on-month price increase (13.36%).
• Contributing factors: the West Asia war has sharply raised jet fuel costs, compounded by seasonal festival-time demand.
• The issue even reached the Supreme Court, with a plea seeking a cap on airfares ahead of the festival season.
  • The Court declined an urgent hearing, with Justice Vikram Nath remarking don’t travel by air.

Chipflation: The Electronics Price Spiral

• The rising cost of memory chips used in consumer electronics — termed “chipflation” — is increasingly driving household inflation.
• October price increases: Pen drives (22%); Phones and laptops (9%); Other major electronic appliances (4-5%)
• Key concern for policymakers: Manufacturers indicate the global chip shortage is not expected to ease for several years — making this a structural, not temporary, inflationary pressure.

Food Inflation: The Most Visible Squeeze

• Food inflation jumped to 8.94% in October — the price rise households notice first and most directly.
• Dining out has also become costlier due to rising cooking gas prices for restaurants.
• Experts attributed the surge to a combination of weak monsoon impact and festival-season demand.

Core Inflation: Why the Underlying Picture Is Also Worsening

• Food and fuel prices are volatile — they can swing sharply due to temporary supply changes. To gauge underlying price pressure, economists track “core inflation” — CPI excluding food and fuel.
• An even more refined measure, “core-core inflation,” excludes food, fuel, and jewellery as well.
• Worrying trend: All underlying inflation measures are rising, not just the headline figure.
• The RBI had projected core inflation at 4.4% average for 2026-27; October’s reading already stood at 4.5%, with the first seven months’ average at 3.9% — indicating inflation is running ahead of RBI’s own projections.

Inflation Is Not Just Rising — It’s Spreading Wider

• A critical concern for the RBI is that inflation is affecting an increasing number of items in the CPI basket.
• 95 of 358 items recorded 6%+ inflation in October, compared to just 40 items in January — more than double in less than a year.
• Experts noted that inflationary pressures are “spreading beyond energy-related sectors,” with pipeline price pressures (from wholesale/producer levels) likely feeding more visibly into consumer prices.
• With WPI (Wholesale Price Index) and PPI (Producer Price Index) inflation still in double digits and growth remaining resilient, further pass-through to consumer prices is highly likely.

Conclusion

India’s inflation crisis extends well beyond seasonal food price swings — rising airfares, a structural global chip shortage, and broadening price pressures across the CPI basket all point to a sustained, not transient, inflationary phase.

With core inflation also climbing and pipeline pressures from wholesale prices still elevated, the RBI faces a genuine challenge in steering inflation back within its mandated band over the coming quarters.

Why in news?

Recently, a US District Court permitted Khalistani separatist Gurpatwant Singh Pannun to serve summons on National Security Adviser (NSA) Ajit Doval and former RAW chief Samant Kumar Goel through Indian courts, in connection with a civil lawsuit alleging a conspiracy to assassinate him.

This lawsuit is linked to the US FBI’s June 2023 findings of an alleged assassination plot against Pannun, who is wanted in India on terror charges. India has dismissed the allegations as fabricated and malicious, but the order raises significant legal questions about international judicial cooperation.

What’s in Today’s Article?

• How Are Summons Served Across Borders?
• India’s Reservations Under the Convention
• Procedural Hurdles: Why Service Often Gets Delayed
• What Exactly Did the US Court Order in the Pannun Case?
• Implications: What This Does and Doesn’t Mean

How Are Summons Served Across Borders?

• The Hague Service Convention (1965) — formally, the Convention on the Service Abroad of Judicial and Extrajudicial Documents in Civil or Commercial Matters — provides the framework for serving legal documents internationally.
• Both India and the US are parties to this Convention.
• Each member state designates a “central authority” to process service requests — in India, this is the Ministry of Law and Justice.
• The treaty permits alternative channels: diplomatic/consular channels, postal service, and direct communication between judicial officers.

India’s Reservations Under the Convention

• India has not accepted the Hague Convention’s alternative service methods without conditions.
• Under Article 10, the treaty allows documents to be served through diplomatic or consular officials directly.
• India objected to this provision, restricting it with one key condition: such officials can serve documents only on their own nationals.
  • In practice, this means US diplomatic or consular officials cannot serve legal documents on Indian citizens — they can only use this route if the recipient is a US national.
• Separately, Article 13 gives India’s Law Ministry the power to refuse a service request — but only on narrow grounds. The Ministry can reject a request only if it believes service would threaten India’s sovereignty or security.
• It cannot refuse merely because the underlying lawsuit is based on a claim that Indian law doesn’t recognise.
• To actually implement the Convention domestically, the government issued a notification in January 2009.
• This extended Section 29(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 to all Convention member countries.
• As a result, when a court in a member country (like the US) issues summons, it can be sent to an Indian court, which then serves it on the defendant exactly as it would serve its own domestic summons.

Procedural Hurdles: Why Service Often Gets Delayed

• The Convention sets no deadline for processing service requests, leaving litigants with limited recourse against delays.
• A 2009 Permanent Bureau assessment (Convention’s monitoring secretariat) found:
  • 66% of requests completed within two months.
  • 18.3% took at least a year.
  • 10.3% were returned unexecuted.
• US courts have repeatedly flagged delays specifically regarding India’s central authority:
  • FTC v. PCCare247 Inc. (2013): A New York court permitted email service of subsequent documents, noting it was impractical to wait 5+ months for every motion.
  • Richmond Technologies, Inc. v. Aumtech Business Solutions (2011): A California court allowed summons to be served via US-based counsel, citing India’s Article 10 objections and anticipated 6-8 month delays.

What Exactly Did the US Court Order in the Pannun Case?

• District Judge noted that Pannun’s three attempts to personally serve Doval during official US visits were blocked by security personnel; attempts via the Law Ministry had also failed.
• Before ruling, the court consulted the US Attorney’s Office and State Department, both of which took “no position”.
• The court invoked Article 19 of the Convention, which allows more liberal service methods permitted under the receiving country’s domestic laws, even if not explicitly covered by the treaty.
• Relying on Section 29(c) of CPC and the 2009 notification, Judge authorised summons against Doval and Goel to be transmitted to three Delhi district courts — Patiala House, Dwarka, and Tis Hazari — based on jurisdiction over their presumed residences.
• The judge rejected Pannun’s argument that India’s earlier refusal made the Convention inapplicable, since the reasons for refusal remained unclear — but left open room for reconsideration if India or an Indian court objects.

Implications: What This Does and Doesn’t Mean

• EAM called the lawsuit “fabricated and malicious”, stating all official communication would be routed through the Law Ministry.
• Crucially: This order concerns only the service of summons — it does not establish liability on the Indian government or the named officials.
• Diplomatic immunity limitation: India has previously invoked diplomatic immunity to refuse service, but in Gurung v. Malhotra (2011), a New York court held that diplomatic immunity is not a valid ground for refusal under Article 13 — only sovereignty or security concerns qualify.
• The safety valve — Article 15: Even if India refuses to cooperate, US courts can pass a default judgment, provided:
  • Documents were transmitted via a Convention-prescribed method.
  • At least six months have elapsed.
  • No certificate of service has been received despite reasonable efforts.
• In Duong v. DDG BIM Services LLC (2023), a US federal court described Article 15 as a safeguard allowing default judgment if “India’s central authority fails to hold up its end of the bargain.”

Conclusion

The Pannun case highlights the delicate balance between international judicial cooperation and national sovereignty. While the Hague Convention obligates India to process foreign summons, it also safeguards India’s right to refuse on security grounds — making the Law Ministry’s eventual response, rather than the US court’s order itself, the decisive factor in this unfolding diplomatic and legal matter.

Why in the News?

• A joint study by the Centre for Domestic Economy Policy Research (C-DEP) and the Centre for WTO Studies (CWS) has identified 23 coal-derived products and recommended prioritising hydrogen, synthetic natural gas, methanol and ammonia under India's Rs. 37,500-crore coal gasification scheme to reduce dependence on imported fuels, fertilisers and industrial chemicals.

What’s in Today’s Article?

• Coal Gasification (Concept, National Coal Gasification Mission)
• C-DEP-CWS Study (Key Findings, Import Substitution Potential, Lessons from China, Challenges, etc.)

Understanding Coal Gasification

• Coal gasification is a process that converts coal into a combustible gas mixture, commonly known as syngas, primarily consisting of carbon monoxide and hydrogen.
• This is achieved by reacting coal with controlled quantities of oxygen, air or steam at high temperatures.
• The resulting syngas can be used directly as a fuel or processed further to produce hydrogen, synthetic natural gas, methanol, ammonia, fertilisers and other industrial chemicals.
• Unlike conventional coal combustion, which primarily generates heat and electricity, gasification enables coal to serve as a feedstock for manufacturing a range of industrial products.

India's National Coal Gasification Mission

• The Government of India has committed 37,500 crore towards promoting surface coal and lignite gasification projects.
• The scheme aims to facilitate the gasification of an additional 75 million tonnes of coal and lignite annually, while India's broader target is to achieve 100 million tonnes of coal gasification capacity by 2030.
• The initiative seeks to leverage India's substantial coal reserves to reduce dependence on imported energy and fertiliser products, strengthen domestic chemical manufacturing and improve strategic supply security.

C-DEP-CWS Study and Priority Products

• The study, titled Coal-to-Chemicals Policy in India: A Strategic Framework for Product Prioritisation under the National Coal Gasification Mission, ranks 23 coal-derived products across eight economic, industrial and strategic parameters.
• It recommends directing investments towards products that offer significant import substitution potential, economic returns and strategic supply security.
• The priority products identified include:
  • Hydrogen: Ranked as the highest-priority product, with applications across refining, fertilisers and industrial processes.
  • Synthetic Natural Gas (SNG): Can serve as a substitute for natural gas in several applications and help reduce gas import dependence.
  • Methanol: An important industrial chemical and feedstock used in multiple downstream industries.
  • Ammonia: A key input for fertiliser manufacturing and other chemical applications.
  • Dimethyl Ether (DME): A potential alternative fuel and industrial chemical.
  • LNG and LPG: Domestic production could help reduce dependence on imported gaseous and liquefied fuels.
  • Urea and Diammonium Phosphate (DAP): Important fertilisers for which India has significant import requirements.

Import Substitution Potential

• India's dependence on imported fuels and fertilisers highlights the economic significance of developing domestic coal-based production.
• The study estimates that India imported nearly US$37 billion worth of LPG, LNG, urea and DAP in 2024.
  • LPG and LNG imports exceeded US$27 billion.
  • Urea and DAP imports accounted for another US$9.6 billion.
• Domestic production of these products through coal gasification could help substitute a portion of these imports, strengthen domestic supply chains and reduce exposure to international price fluctuations and supply disruptions.

Lessons from China's Coal-to-Chemicals Industry

• The study draws lessons from China's experience in developing its coal-to-chemicals industry.
• Integrated industrial clusters helped China expand domestic production of fertilisers, methanol and downstream chemicals.
• However, China's experience also highlights important risks associated with rapid capacity expansion, including:
  • Underutilisation of industrial plants.
  • High capital investment requirements.
  • Significant water constraints.
• The study therefore recommends that India avoid rapid, uncoordinated expansion and adopt a phased investment approach.
• It also proposes developing integrated manufacturing clusters where common coal gasification facilities can supply multiple downstream chemical industries. This approach could improve infrastructure utilisation and support economies of scale.

Challenges in Commercialising Coal Gasification

• Commercial viability: The economic feasibility of technologies suited to Indian coal needs to be established before large-scale investments are undertaken.
• Technology suitability: Industry must test available technologies and demonstrate their performance under Indian coal conditions.
• Capital intensity: Coal gasification and downstream chemical manufacturing require substantial investment, making project viability and utilisation critical.
• Water constraints: Coal gasification and associated chemical processes can require significant quantities of water, creating challenges in water-stressed regions.
• Addressing these challenges will be essential before the sector can achieve commercial scale.

Way Forward

• The study recommends a product-focused strategy that aligns investment decisions with import dependence, strategic importance and economic returns.
• The government has already created policy and financial support, while commercially viable projects would help shape a more targeted product-prioritisation framework.
• A phased approach, integrated manufacturing clusters and careful assessment of technology and resource requirements can help India develop a sustainable domestic coal-to-chemicals industry.

Why in News?

• Amid persistently high air pollution levels in Delhi-NCR, Union Environment Minister has directed stricter enforcement of pollution-control measures, including sealing 191 non-compliant industries and fixing administrative accountability for delays.
• The review meeting involving Delhi, Haryana, UP and Rajasthan highlighted the need for coordinated regional action, as air pollution transcends state boundaries.

Industrial Emissions:

• Strict enforcement:
  • 191 polluting industries have been directed to be sealed by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) for failing to install Air Pollution Control Devices (APCDs).
  • Of the 2,345 targeted industrial units, 2,298 (approximately 98%) have been connected to the Online Continuous Emission Monitoring System (OCEMS). The remaining 47 units have been closed or sealed.
  • Strict compliance with the particulate matter emission limit of 50 mg/Nm³ has been directed.
  • Non-compliant industries may face closure, electricity disconnection and sealing.
• Administrative accountability:
  • Haryana, UP and Rajasthan have been asked to nominate secretary-level officers to supervise pollution-control measures in 15 cities (seven in Haryana and four each in UP and Rajasthan).
  • These officers will conduct field inspections and submit weekly progress reports to the Commission for Air Quality Management (CAQM).
  • CAQM has been asked to issue notices and initiate criminal prosecution against officials failing to discharge their responsibilities.

Vehicular Pollution and Traffic Decongestion:

• ANPR cameras: Transport departments have been directed to install Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras by November 30. Failure may invite criminal prosecution of responsible officials.
• Multi-lane free flow (MLFF): The Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) must complete installation of MLFF systems at 154 Delhi border entry points by December 31, 2026, to reduce congestion and vehicle idling.
• Traffic congestion: Immediate corrective measures have been directed at 233 identified congestion points across NCR, alongside fresh assessments by states.
• PARIVARTAN scheme: The scheme is to be expedited to replace pre-BS-VI trucks and buses with BS-VI-compliant, CNG and electric vehicles by 2028.

Road Dust Management and Construction Activities:

• Only 3,221 km of the targeted 5,480 km of roads have been redeveloped.
• Road-owning agencies have been directed to prioritise repair of potholes and damaged footpaths, maintenance of central verges, and end-to-end paving of roads.
• Mechanical road-sweeping machines must operate at full capacity in double shifts, supported by digital tracking and AI-based monitoring through Integrated Command and Control Centres (ICCCs).
• Physical inspections of more than 3,000 active construction sites have been directed to ensure compliance with dust-control measures.

Municipal Solid Waste Management:

• NCR faces a shortfall of 6,747 tonnes per day in municipal solid waste processing capacity.
• States have been directed to prevent open dumping and burning of waste and expedite the remediation of legacy waste at four major landfill sites (Okhla, Ghazipur, Bhalswa, and Bandhwari).

Graded Response Action Plan (GRAP):

• All agencies have been directed to ensure strict implementation of the GRAP.
• NCR states have been encouraged to adopt Delhi's hotspot-focused winter action plan, covering:
  • Traffic management and decongestion.
  • Work-from-home measures.
  • Restrictions on construction activities.
  • Prevention of open waste and biomass burning.
• Technology-driven monitoring through Delhi's ICCC and CAQM's PAVAN platform will strengthen enforcement and track pollution-control measures.

Delhi's Air Quality - Persistently 'Very Poor':

• Delhi's 24-hour average Air Quality Index (AQI) is hovering around 370.
• Of the 59 monitoring stations reporting data - 17 recorded severe air pollution, 38 recorded very poor air quality, 3 recorded poor air quality, and only 1 recorded moderate air quality. PM10 was the predominant pollutant.
• Major sources of pollution are vehicular emissions, stubble burning, firecrackers, etc.

Key Challenges:

• Fragmented governance: Multiple state agencies and municipal bodies complicate coordinated enforcement.
• Implementation deficit: Delays in road redevelopment, waste processing and installation of pollution-control equipment undermine existing regulations.
• Vehicular dependence: Traffic congestion and older commercial vehicles continue to contribute significantly to emissions.
• Transboundary pollution: Pollution from stubble burning, industries and transport across NCR requires inter-state coordination.
• Weak accountability: Delayed action and inadequate monitoring reduce the effectiveness of pollution-control measures.

Way Forward:

• Strengthen the CAQM's coordinating and enforcement capacity across NCR.
• Shift from episodic winter interventions to year-round, airshed-based pollution management.
• Accelerate public transport, electric mobility and cleaner industrial technologies.
• Expand scientific source apportionment and real-time emissions monitoring.
• Strengthen municipal waste segregation, processing and scientific landfill remediation.
• Ensure measurable accountability through time-bound targets, independent inspections and transparent public reporting.

Conclusion:

• Delhi-NCR's air pollution crisis requires a transition from reactive emergency measures to sustained, science-based and regionally coordinated air-quality governance.
• Effective implementation, institutional accountability and cleaner urban infrastructure are essential to securing the constitutional right to a clean and healthy environment.