Demonetisation and the Health Costs of Cash Shortages
Context
- India’s demonetisation of November 8, 2016, withdrew ₹500 and ₹1,000 notes, representing approximately 86% of currency in circulation by value, with only four hours’ notice.
- The objectives included curbing black money, counterfeit currency and promoting digital payments.
- However, the exercise created a massive liquidity shock in a cash-dependent economy.
- Although nearly 99.3% of demonetised currency returned to the banking system, the temporary cash shortage disrupted economic activities and essential consumption.
Demonetisation Effect on Medicine Consumption
- Understanding Differences in Medicine Consumption
- Research published in the Journal of Economics and Management Strategy examines pharmaceutical consumption during demonetisation using the All India Organisation of Chemists and Druggists (AIOCD) database.
- It covers monthly sales across 805 pharmaceutical firms, 31 regions and 18 illness categories.
- The study distinguishes between:
- Chronic medicines, which are purchased regularly for long-term illnesses, allowing consumers to compare prices and identify affordable alternatives.
- Acute medicines, which are required for sudden illnesses such as infections, pain and gastrointestinal problems, leaving little opportunity to postpone purchases or search for alternatives.
- This difference is explained through search costs, the time and resources required to identify suitable products and compare prices.
- Consumers purchasing chronic medicines can plan their expenditure, whereas acute medicine purchases are generally urgent and unanticipated.
- Evidence of Reduced Medicine Consumption
- Using a difference-in-differences research design, the study found that acute medicine sales volume declined by approximately 3.6%, while sales value fell by 3.1% relative to chronic medicines.
- The decline was not caused by products disappearing from the market or increasing prices.
- The number of unique products and the interquartile range of prices remained unchanged.
- This indicates an intensive-margin contraction, meaning consumers purchased smaller quantities of available medicines.
- Prescription data from IQVIA and disease-outbreak information from the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) also revealed no significant changes in prescription trends or acute disease outbreaks.
- Thus, the decline was associated with cash constraints rather than reduced medical requirements.
- Healthcare Vulnerability in a Cash-Dependent Economy
- India's substantial out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure makes households particularly vulnerable to sudden financial disruptions.
- Unlike insured populations in developed economies, many Indian families directly finance medicines and treatment.
- Consequently, medicines may remain available and prices stable, yet patients may be unable to purchase them because of inadequate cash.
- Therefore, market availability does not guarantee actual healthcare access.
Lessons for the Future
- Assessing the Distributional Consequences of Monetary Policy
- Currency replacement exercises may pursue legitimate objectives, including reducing counterfeit currency, improving tax compliance and encouraging digital transactions.
- However, policymakers must evaluate their wider social consequences.
- Research by Das and other economists indicates that demonetisation generated only modest tax gains.
- Moreover, the return of almost all withdrawn currency raises questions about the extent of its effectiveness in achieving its stated objectives.
- The pharmaceutical findings demonstrate that economic disruptions affect different categories of consumers unequally.
- Therefore, distributional consequences must be assessed alongside monetary and administrative objectives.
- Strengthening Public Health Infrastructure
- The study identifies public health infrastructure as an important buffer against liquidity shocks.
- Regions with weaker public healthcare facilities experienced larger declines in acute medicine consumption.
- Several initiatives can strengthen healthcare resilience:
- PM Bhartiya Janaushadhi Kendras improve access to affordable generic medicines.
- AB-PMJAY provides financial protection against eligible hospitalisation expenses.
- UPI-based digital payments facilitate cashless transactions at pharmacies.
- However, digital payments cannot completely replace cash because of inadequate connectivity, limited digital literacy and unequal banking access.
- Future currency operations should incorporate health-sector safeguards, including emergency credit facilities for pharmacies, uninterrupted medicine supplies and accessible digital payment systems.
The Way Forward: Building Evidence-Based Public Policy
- Although pharmaceutical sales data reveal changes in medicine consumption, they do not establish the direct consequences for household health outcomes.
- Reduced medicine purchases may lead to delayed treatment, worsening illnesses and additional medical complications.
- India therefore needs integrated consumption-health databases linking household expenditure, prescriptions, medicine purchases and health outcomes.
- Additionally, pre-registered evaluation protocols should accompany large-scale economic interventions.
- These would establish measurable indicators, identify vulnerable populations and facilitate independent assessments of policy consequences.
- Improved data systems would help governments anticipate unintended effects and introduce appropriate safeguards before implementing disruptive economic measures.
Conclusion
- A decade after demonetisation, its experience offers important lessons for monetary policy and public health.
- Although digital payment adoption accelerated and counterfeit currency was withdrawn, sudden cash shortages also disrupted essential consumption.
- For households dependent on out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure, financial disruptions can result in delayed treatment and reduced access to essential medicines.
- Future economic interventions must balance financial objectives with social protection.
- Ultimately, economic reforms must protect essential consumption, ensuring that financial disruptions do not compromise access to medicines and basic healthcare, particularly among vulnerable populations.