Skip to content
Vajiram & RaviStudent Portal Search tests, topics, videos… Login Register

Demonetisation and the Health Costs of Cash Shortages

Nov. 9, 2026

Context

  • India’s demonetisation of November 8, 2016, withdrew ₹500 and ₹1,000 notes, representing approximately 86% of currency in circulation by value, with only four hours’ notice.
  • The objectives included curbing black money, counterfeit currency and promoting digital payments.
  • However, the exercise created a massive liquidity shock in a cash-dependent economy.
  • Although nearly 99.3% of demonetised currency returned to the banking system, the temporary cash shortage disrupted economic activities and essential consumption.

Demonetisation Effect on Medicine Consumption

  • Understanding Differences in Medicine Consumption
    • Research published in the Journal of Economics and Management Strategy examines pharmaceutical consumption during demonetisation using the All India Organisation of Chemists and Druggists (AIOCD) database.
    • It covers monthly sales across 805 pharmaceutical firms, 31 regions and 18 illness categories.
    • The study distinguishes between:
      • Chronic medicines, which are purchased regularly for long-term illnesses, allowing consumers to compare prices and identify affordable alternatives.
      • Acute medicines, which are required for sudden illnesses such as infections, pain and gastrointestinal problems, leaving little opportunity to postpone purchases or search for alternatives.
    • This difference is explained through search costs, the time and resources required to identify suitable products and compare prices.
    • Consumers purchasing chronic medicines can plan their expenditure, whereas acute medicine purchases are generally urgent and unanticipated.
  • Evidence of Reduced Medicine Consumption
    • Using a difference-in-differences research design, the study found that acute medicine sales volume declined by approximately 3.6%, while sales value fell by 3.1% relative to chronic medicines.
    • The decline was not caused by products disappearing from the market or increasing prices.
    • The number of unique products and the interquartile range of prices remained unchanged.
    • This indicates an intensive-margin contraction, meaning consumers purchased smaller quantities of available medicines.
    • Prescription data from IQVIA and disease-outbreak information from the Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme (IDSP) also revealed no significant changes in prescription trends or acute disease outbreaks.
    • Thus, the decline was associated with cash constraints rather than reduced medical requirements.
  • Healthcare Vulnerability in a Cash-Dependent Economy
    • India's substantial out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure makes households particularly vulnerable to sudden financial disruptions.
    • Unlike insured populations in developed economies, many Indian families directly finance medicines and treatment.
    • Consequently, medicines may remain available and prices stable, yet patients may be unable to purchase them because of inadequate cash.
    • Therefore, market availability does not guarantee actual healthcare access.

Lessons for the Future

  • Assessing the Distributional Consequences of Monetary Policy
    • Currency replacement exercises may pursue legitimate objectives, including reducing counterfeit currency, improving tax compliance and encouraging digital transactions.
    • However, policymakers must evaluate their wider social consequences.
    • Research by Das and other economists indicates that demonetisation generated only modest tax gains.
    • Moreover, the return of almost all withdrawn currency raises questions about the extent of its effectiveness in achieving its stated objectives.
    • The pharmaceutical findings demonstrate that economic disruptions affect different categories of consumers unequally.
    • Therefore, distributional consequences must be assessed alongside monetary and administrative objectives.
  • Strengthening Public Health Infrastructure
    • The study identifies public health infrastructure as an important buffer against liquidity shocks.
    • Regions with weaker public healthcare facilities experienced larger declines in acute medicine consumption.
    • Several initiatives can strengthen healthcare resilience:
      • PM Bhartiya Janaushadhi Kendras improve access to affordable generic medicines.
      • AB-PMJAY provides financial protection against eligible hospitalisation expenses.
      • UPI-based digital payments facilitate cashless transactions at pharmacies.
      • However, digital payments cannot completely replace cash because of inadequate connectivity, limited digital literacy and unequal banking access.
      • Future currency operations should incorporate health-sector safeguards, including emergency credit facilities for pharmacies, uninterrupted medicine supplies and accessible digital payment systems.

The Way Forward: Building Evidence-Based Public Policy

  • Although pharmaceutical sales data reveal changes in medicine consumption, they do not establish the direct consequences for household health outcomes.
  • Reduced medicine purchases may lead to delayed treatment, worsening illnesses and additional medical complications.
  • India therefore needs integrated consumption-health databases linking household expenditure, prescriptions, medicine purchases and health outcomes.
  • Additionally, pre-registered evaluation protocols should accompany large-scale economic interventions.
  • These would establish measurable indicators, identify vulnerable populations and facilitate independent assessments of policy consequences.
  • Improved data systems would help governments anticipate unintended effects and introduce appropriate safeguards before implementing disruptive economic measures.

Conclusion

  • A decade after demonetisation, its experience offers important lessons for monetary policy and public health.
  • Although digital payment adoption accelerated and counterfeit currency was withdrawn, sudden cash shortages also disrupted essential consumption.
  • For households dependent on out-of-pocket healthcare expenditure, financial disruptions can result in delayed treatment and reduced access to essential medicines.
  • Future economic interventions must balance financial objectives with social protection.
  • Ultimately, economic reforms must protect essential consumption, ensuring that financial disruptions do not compromise access to medicines and basic healthcare, particularly among vulnerable populations.