Context:

• In February 2026, India hosted the India AI Impact Summit 2026. The goal was to place the needs of the Global South at the centre of global Artificial Intelligence (AI) discussions.
• India's approach was different from earlier AI summits — Bletchley Park (2023, UK), Seoul (2024), and Paris (2025).
• Those summits had focused mainly on catastrophic and existential risks of AI. India's summit instead focused on real-world harms, equity, and inclusion — issues that matter more directly to developing nations.

How Did India's Position Shift After the Summit?

• As the summit progressed, the focus quietly changed. Instead of championing Global South solidarity, India's attention shifted toward raising capital for AI development and pushing domestic adoption of AI use cases.
• India began positioning itself as a "middle power" in global AI politics — moving away from its original role as a Global South representative.
• This shift became clearer when India joined Pax Silica. This is significant because Pax Silica signals alignment with the US-dominated semiconductor supply chain.
• As part of this arrangement, India agreed to adopt a pro-innovation regulatory approach.
• This essentially means lighter regulation — a trade-off that comes at the cost of India's strategic autonomy.

The Middle Power Dilemma

• India's attempt to reposition itself as a "middle power" is diplomatically appealing but strategically shaky.
• India wants to be seen alongside countries like Japan and various European nations. However, these countries do not see India as their technological or economic peer.
• This ambition also clashes with ground realities: India's colonial history and its low per capita income firmly place it within the Global South, not alongside advanced economies.

Can the US Be a Reliable AI Partner?

• Adding to this dilemma is the United States' evolving foreign policy stance. The US has been actively pushing global adoption of American AI technology, while showing little interest in participating in global multilateral or multistakeholder AI governance frameworks.
• This raises an important concern: will this repeat what happened with social media?
• Earlier, US foreign policy resisted global regulation of social media platforms to protect American companies' interests — even though harms were borne globally, including within the US itself.
• There's a real risk of the same pattern repeating with AI, where economic benefits mostly flow to American industry, while both India and the US bear the social and economic costs.

What Risks Does India Face?

• Several important questions arise from this situation:
  • Will India merely become a consumer of American AI technology, with Indian users absorbing disproportionate harms?
  • Will India simply serve as a source of raw material for AI — providing data, cheap labour for data-labelling, minerals for manufacturing, and natural resources like land, water, and electricity for data centres — mainly benefiting American Big Tech companies?
• There is already evidence pointing in this direction. Since the February summit, India has allocated land for data centres, which has led to displacement of local communities and resulting protests.
• There are no strong safeguards protecting these communities as American firms scrape public content to build AI datasets, including indigenous knowledge systems.
• Meanwhile, India's own AI capabilities remain limited. It cannot yet compete with global foundational AI models.
• Its semiconductor sector is largely stuck at low-value assembly work rather than advanced manufacturing.
• There are also concerns about whether India has enough capital to build and grow its own AI ecosystem independently.

A Window of Opportunity: The UN Global Dialogue

• Despite these challenges, there's a genuine opportunity ahead. The first part of a two-part UN Global Dialogue on AI Governance is taking place in Geneva (July 6-7, 2026).
• This platform brings together global stakeholders to collectively shape international rules for AI governance.
• India has a real chance here to unite a currently fragmented global AI policy discussion — one that currently lacks a clear leader.
• India possesses the political influence, technical capability, and a large, diverse market to take up this leadership role.
• Instead of positioning itself as merely an investment destination or a consumer market for AI products, India could instead champion a vision of AI development rooted in public purpose, user safety, strategic autonomy, and genuine international cooperation.

What Should India Push For?

• India should advocate for international norms that help Global South nations:
  • Build their own local AI ecosystems
  • Foster homegrown innovation
  • Protect users from AI-related harms
  • Strengthen regulatory capacity
  • Enable skill development
  • Build domestic digital infrastructure
• India should also raise important debates around competition and consumer protection in AI markets, ensuring economic value generated stays within national economies rather than flowing entirely to foreign Big Tech firms.

Building Global South Solidarity

• Beyond its own interests, India must also create genuine pathways for cooperation among Global South countries.
• The Geneva dialogue offers a critical moment for these nations to come together and strengthen their collective agency and strategic autonomy.
• This would require innovative approaches — pooling resources and capacity together on things like data sharing, computing infrastructure, common technical standards, and shared governance protocols.
• It would also mean building stronger regulatory and technical institutions across Global South nations collectively.

Conclusion

• India stands at a genuine crossroads — between becoming a mere consumer of Big Tech's AI ambitions or emerging as a principled leader for the Global South.
• Choosing solidarity over dependency could help build equitable, autonomous, and inclusive AI governance benefiting billions across developing nations.

Why in the News?

• The India Meteorological Department has forecast below-normal rainfall in July after a 40% deficit in June, raising concerns about the impact of a weak monsoon and a potential "super" El Nino on India's economy.

What’s in Today’s Article?

• El Nino & Monsoon (Background, Relation, Impact on Economy, Past Examples, India’s Preparedness, Way Forward)

Understanding the Monsoon and El Nino Connection

• The southwest monsoon (June-September) is the lifeline of India's economy, delivering about 75% of the country's annual rainfall.
• It supports agriculture, replenishes reservoirs, recharges groundwater, and sustains hydropower generation.
• El Nino is a climate phenomenon marked by the warming of surface waters in the equatorial Pacific Ocean, off the north-western coast of South America.
• It has a tendency to suppress rainfall over the Indian region, though the impact usually comes with a lag of over a month.
• A "super" El Nino refers to a particularly strong phase of this phenomenon, which can cause more severe rainfall deficits and prolonged droughts.
• Historically, several of India's worst droughts have coincided with El Nino years, including 1972, 1982, 2009, and 2015.

How a Poor Monsoon Damages the Economy?

• Impact on Agricultural Output

• Agriculture accounts for about one-fifth of India's Gross Value Added (GVA) but employs 46% of the workforce.
• Nearly 55% of the population depends on agriculture directly or indirectly.
• India came into the current kharif season from a strong position, foodgrain output in 2024-25 rose to 357.73 million metric tonnes, up 25.43 MMT from the previous year.
• A weak monsoon puts this momentum at risk, particularly for kharif crops like paddy, maize, pulses, and cotton.

• Impact on Rural Incomes and Demand

• A weak monsoon hits rural income, denting aggregate demand across the economy.
• Farm incomes could fall by up to 10% during a weak monsoon year.
• The rural non-farm sector, mainly non-traded services like construction, contracts when agriculture is affected.
• Industries dependent on rural demand, including two-wheelers, tractors, and real estate in smaller towns, are among the first to feel the squeeze.

• Food Inflation Pressures

• A weak monsoon threatens to push up food prices, fuelling inflation.
• The RBI has warned in its June bulletin that an adverse southwest monsoon may weigh on the domestic growth-inflation outlook.
• Data up to June 18 already showed food inflation continuing to rise, with prices of edible oils, potatoes, onions, and tomatoes edging up.

Broader Economic Impact

• GDP Growth Concerns
  • According to analyses by financial firms, a combined El Nino-plus-drought scenario could shave 20-65 basis points off India's GDP growth.
• Cropping Pattern Shifts

• Paddy acreage is expected to expand in Punjab, Haryana, and Bihar.
• Maize acreage may decline as farmers shift to more remunerative crops.
• Pulses may be preferred due to lower cultivation costs and water requirements.
• Some farmers may choose not to plant vegetables at all.
• Decisions are influenced by irrigation availability, MSP, procurement support, and market conditions.

• Fertiliser and Supply Constraints
  • Pest attacks in weakened crops.
  • Fertiliser supply constraints caused by the Iran conflict.
  • The Union Cabinet approved a Rs. 41,533 crore Nutrient-Based Subsidy for phosphatic and potassic fertilisers for the kharif season, covering 28 grades.
• External Sector Impact
  • If domestic output falls short:
    • The government may release buffer stocks and increase imports.
    • This could widen the Current Account Deficit and put pressure on the rupee.
  • India's agricultural exports, which have grown at a CAGR of 8.2% between FY20 and FY25 and contribute 12% to core exports, face a threat.

Lessons from Past El Nino Years

• The 2009 and 2015 monsoon failures illustrate how differently poor monsoons can affect the economy:
• 2009 and Its Aftermath

• Two subsequent years of rainfall stress.
• All-India average irrigation cover less than 45%.
• Crop GVA contracted 2.5% and 3.2% in FY09 and FY10, respectively.
• Inflation reached double digits.

• 2015 Experience

• Both 2014 and 2015 saw monsoon disruptions as El Nino moved from weak to strong.
• Crop GVA contracted, but the impact on inflation was muted.
• Reasons for controlled inflation included:
• Proactive food management
• Restrained MSP hikes
• Global commodity price slump

• Since 2000, of the 11 instances of below-normal or deficient monsoon at the all-India level, six were classified as El Nino years by the IMD, with five seeing deficient rainfall.

India’s Preparedness

• The government has identified vulnerabilities:

• 315 districts are vulnerable to a poor monsoon.
• 111 districts across 12 States are of primary concern due to poor irrigation facilities.

• Reservoir Storage Status
  • As of July 2, Storage levels across the 166 reservoirs monitored by the Central Water Commission stood at 47.725 BCM.
  • This is lower than 78.077 BCM during the corresponding period last year.
  • It is also below the normal storage of 48.402 BCM for this time of year.
  • While the system can meet current requirements, a prolonged poor monsoon could strain it significantly.

• Structural Preparedness
  • Experts have raised concerns about India's disaster preparedness:
    • Irrigation is crucial for adapting to climate change-induced water stress.
    • India needs to move from crop insurance to ex-ante risk reduction.
    • Investment in drought-resistant, high-yielding crops remains inadequate.
    • Public investment in risk reduction is currently lacking.

• A second successive bad weather year would be significantly more damaging.

Way Forward

• Short-Term Measures

• Strengthen buffer stocks to manage food supply.
• Monitor food inflation and take proactive measures.
• Support farmers in vulnerable districts with contingency plans.
• Manage fertiliser supply through diversified imports.

• Medium-Term Reforms

• Expand irrigation coverage, especially in rain-fed regions.
• Promote water-efficient crops and precision agriculture.
• Strengthen crop insurance with quicker settlements.
• Enhance weather forecasting and early warning systems.

• Long-Term Strategy

• Drought-proof the economy through structural reforms.
• Move from crop insurance to ex-ante risk reduction.
• Invest in drought-resistant, high-yielding crop varieties and ensure farmer access.
• Modernise water storage and management infrastructure.
• Diversify rural economy to reduce dependence on agriculture alone.
• Strengthen public investment in agricultural R&D and disaster preparedness.

Context:

• The Indian Prime Minister's visit to Indonesia (July 6–8) comes at a strategically significant time as India seeks to secure critical mineral supply chains essential for its clean energy transition and electric mobility ambitions.
• The visit aims to deepen the 2018 Comprehensive Strategic Partnership by expanding cooperation in defence, connectivity, maritime security, emerging technologies, etc.

Why Indonesia Matters for India?

• Critical minerals and energy security:
  • India's transition to electric vehicles (EVs) and renewable energy depends heavily on uninterrupted access to critical minerals, particularly nickel, a key component in lithium-ion batteries.
  • Indonesia possesses the world's largest nickel reserves and is also rich in cobalt, bauxite, tin and rare earth elements.
  • Chinese companies currently dominate Indonesia's downstream nickel processing through large-scale investments, giving Beijing considerable influence over global battery supply chains.
  • India has a narrow window to establish a meaningful presence through:
    • Joint ventures.
    • Upstream mining equity.
    • Mineral processing partnerships.
    • Long-term commercial investments across Indonesia's critical mineral value chain.
  • Success will depend on the ability of Indian industry to compete with the speed and scale of Chinese investments.
• Strategic and geopolitical significance:
  • Maritime security in the Indo-Pacific:
    • Indonesia occupies a pivotal geostrategic position as the world's largest archipelagic state, controlling access to the Malacca Strait, one of the busiest global maritime chokepoints.
    • India and Indonesia share a maritime boundary in the Andaman Sea, making cooperation on maritime security, connectivity and freedom of navigation strategically indispensable.
    • India's Act East Policy complements Indonesia's maritime vision, with the Sabang Port (Aceh province) offering significant potential for strategic and commercial cooperation.
  • Counterbalancing China's growing influence:
    • China's expanding maritime assertiveness, especially its Nine-Dash Line claims overlapping Indonesia's Exclusive Economic Zone near the Natuna Islands, has heightened regional security concerns.
    • While Indonesia continues strong economic engagement with China, it is simultaneously diversifying its strategic partnerships with India and other regional partners.
    • India, through frameworks such as the Quad, seeks to promote a free, open and rules-based Indo-Pacific while respecting ASEAN centrality.
• Economic cooperation - Expanding trade and investment:
• Indonesia is India's 2nd-largest trading partner (total bilateral trade - ~ US$40 billion) within ASEAN, yet bilateral economic engagement remains below potential.
• India is a major consumer of Indonesian coal and crude palm oil, while exporting refined petroleum, commercial vehicles, and agricultural products.
• India currently faces a trade deficit of nearly US$20 billion with Indonesia.
• Both countries have set an ambitious target of increasing bilateral trade to US$100 billion by 2030.
• Greater cooperation in critical minerals, manufacturing and infrastructure could rebalance trade while improving India's supply-chain resilience.
• Defence cooperation:
  • Defence cooperation could emerge as the most immediate outcome of the visit.
  • The two nations engage in robust defense diplomacy - regular coordinated naval patrols (CORPAT), bilateral exercises like Samudra Shakti and Garuda Shakti.
  • Progress on Indonesia's proposed acquisition of BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles would:
    • Enhance Indonesia's maritime deterrence capability.
    • Strengthen India's defence exports following the Philippines deal.
    • Reinforce India's reputation as a reliable security partner.
• Regional and multilateral cooperation - Shared Indo-Pacific vision:
  • India and Indonesia share common interests in preserving freedom of navigation, ensuring maritime stability, supporting ASEAN centrality, and promoting resilient regional supply chains.
  • Indonesia's membership in BRICS and the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA) further expands opportunities for bilateral and multilateral cooperation on regional governance and economic resilience.

India-Indonesia Relations:

• Historical foundations:
  • India and Indonesia share centuries-old civilisational ties through Java, Bali and Sumatra.
  • Their partnership was strengthened during the 1955 Bandung Conference, which laid the foundations of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM).
  • Long-standing diplomatic cooperation, including close interaction at the United Nations, has fostered trust that continues to support contemporary strategic engagement.
• Connectivity - The missing link:
  • Despite strong strategic convergence, people-to-people and commercial exchanges remain constrained by the limited direct air connectivity, inadequate shipping links, and restrictive visa procedures.
  • Therefore, strengthening connectivity, particularly between India's A&N Islands and Indonesia's Aceh Province, can significantly enhance trade, tourism, logistics and maritime cooperation.

Conclusion:

• The Indian PM's Indonesia visit represents a strategic opportunity to transform longstanding goodwill into a concrete partnership.
• Enhanced cooperation will strengthen supply-chain resilience, reinforce a free and open Indo-Pacific, and elevate the India–Indonesia Comprehensive Strategic Partnership to a new level of strategic relevance.

Context

• The right to vote is the foundation of a democracy, enabling citizens to choose their representatives and ensure governmental accountability.
• Yet, the Supreme Court of India has consistently treated voting as a statutory right, not a fundamental right.
• Over time, however, the Court has granted constitutional protection to several essential aspects of voting, creating a constitutional paradox.
• While the freedoms associated with voting are protected, the act of voting itself remains statutory, raising questions about its compatibility with constitutional principles.

Historical Judicial Position

• The traditional position originated in N. P. Ponnuswami vs Returning Officer (1952), where the Court held that the rights to vote and contest elections are created by statute rather than common law or the Constitution.
• This view was reaffirmed in Jyoti Basu vs Debi Ghosal (1982), where Justice O. Chinnappa Reddy described voting as fundamental to democracy but still a statutory right.
• In Kuldip Nayar vs Union of India (2006), the Constitution Bench reiterated that while democracy forms part of the Basic Structure, the right to vote flows from the Representation of the People Acts.
• Since the Constitution does not expressly include voting in Part III, Parliament retains the authority to regulate electoral qualifications, disqualifications, and procedures.

The Constitutionalisation of Voting Rights

• Judicial decisions have progressively expanded constitutional protection over the electoral process.
• In Union of India vs Association for Democratic Reforms (2002), the Court held that voters possess the right to know candidates' criminal records, educational qualifications, and financial assets under Article 19(1)(a), recognising informed voting as essential for meaningful democracy.
• In People's Union of Civil Liberties vs Union of India (2003), the Court distinguished between the statutory right to vote and the freedom to vote, holding that making an informed choice is protected by freedom of speech and expression.
• The NOTA judgment (2013) further recognized choosing None of the Above as a form of political expression protected by Article 19(1)(a).
• It also extended ballot secrecy to NOTA voters, reinforcing constitutional safeguards over electoral choice.

The Constitutional Paradox

• The constitutional framework now protects the right to know, informed choice, ballot secrecy, and even the right to reject all candidates.
• Yet the actual act of choosing a candidate continues to be classified as merely statutory.
• This creates an inconsistency: if rejecting every candidate is constitutionally protected, the positive act of selecting one logically deserves similar constitutional recognition.

Recent Judicial Developments

• In Anoop Baranwal vs Union of India (2023), Justice Ajay Rastogi supported recognising voting as a fundamental right.
• Although this opinion did not command a majority, the Constitution Bench repeatedly described voting as a constitutional right, reflecting a significant departure from the earlier narrow statutory approach.

Voting and the Basic Structure Doctrine

• The Basic Structure Doctrine, established in Kesavananda Bharati vs State of Kerala (1973), identifies democracy as an inviolable constitutional principle.
• In Indira Nehru Gandhi vs Shri Raj Narain (1975), the Court further declared free and fair elections an essential feature of democracy.
• Democracy operates through elections, and elections derive legitimacy from citizens exercising the ballot.
• As the instrument of popular sovereignty, voting enables citizens to periodically renew governmental legitimacy and ensure accountability.
• Treating democracy as part of the Constitution's basic structure while denying constitutional protection to voting appears inconsistent.

The Importance of Article 326 and the Need for Constitutional Recognition

• The Importance of Article 326
  • Article 326 guarantees universal adult suffrage for elections to the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies.
  • Every eligible citizen above eighteen has a constitutional entitlement to be registered as an elector, subject only to limited disqualifications.
  • The Representation of the People Acts merely operationalise this constitutional guarantee.
  • Consequently, the citizen's entitlement to participate in elections originates from the Constitution rather than ordinary legislation.
• Need for Constitutional Recognition
  • Recognising voting as a constitutional or fundamental right does not eliminate Parliament's power to regulate electoral procedures such as age, electoral rolls, residency, or disqualifications.
  • Constitutional protection should extend only to the core right of every eligible citizen to participate in the democratic process while allowing reasonable regulation for orderly elections.

Conclusion

• The distinction between statutory and constitutional voting rights has become increasingly difficult to justify.
• Judicial recognition of the right to know, freedom of choice, NOTA, and ballot secrecy has already constitutionalised most aspects of voting.
• Given the centrality of democracy, free and fair elections, and Article 326, the right of every eligible citizen to vote deserves constitutional recognition.
• The ballot is not merely a statutory privilege but the primary instrument through which the people exercise sovereignty and sustain the democratic legitimacy of the Republic.

About Bandipur Tiger Reserve:

• It is situated in the Mysore and Chamarajanagar revenue districts of southern Karnataka.
• It is located at the tri-junction area of the States of Karnataka, Tamil Nadu, and Kerala.
• Geographically, it is an “ecological confluence” of the Western and Eastern Ghats.
• It was once a hunting ground for the rulers of the neighbouring kingdom of Mysore.
• It is part of the larger Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, which is recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage Site.
• BTR is surrounded by:
  • Nagarahole Tiger Reserve (Tamil Nadu) in the North West (Kabini Reservoir separates the two).
  • Mudumalai Tiger Reserve (Tamil Nadu) in the South.
  • Wayanad Wildlife Sanctuary (Kerala) in the South West.
• Rivers:
  • It is surrounded by River Kabini in its north and River Moyar in its south.
  • The Nugu River runs through the reserve.
  • Himavad Gopalaswamy Betta Hill is the highest point in the park.
  • Climate: It has a typical tropical climate with distinct wet and dry seasons.
  • Vegetation: The park has various biomes, including dry deciduous forests, moist deciduous forests, and shrublands.
• Flora:
  • It supports a wide range of timber trees, including teak wood, rosewood, sandalwood, and a variety of bamboo.
  • There are also several notable flowering and fruiting trees and shrubs including Indian gooseberry, kadam tree, golden shower tree.
• Fauna:
  • It is home to mammals such as the Bengal tiger, gaur, sloth bear, golden jackal, dhole, four-horned antelope, etc.
  • It is a shelter for the largest population of wild Asian elephants in South Asia.
  • It is home to over 200 species of birds, among which the Indian peafowl is the most commonly spotted
  • Other species of birds include honey buzzards, redheaded vultures, Indian vultures , etc.

About Sirsa Kinnow:

• It is a variety of Kinnow grown in the Sirsa district of Haryana.
• It is Haryana's first fruit to receive a Geographical Indication (GI) tag.

What is Kinnow?

• Kinnow is a hybrid citrus fruit.
• It is a hybrid between two citrus cultivars, namely ‘King’ (Citrus nobilis) and ‘Willow Leaf’ mandarin (Citrus deliciosa).
• The hybrid was developed in 1915 by HB Frost at the University of California Citrus Experimentation Station.
• It is round, large, and has golden-orange skin similar to an orange.
• It has a sweet and sour taste.
• It comprises a high amount of juice content, making it ideal for extracting juice and pulp.
• It is a rich source of Vitamin C and minerals like calcium and potassium, which are beneficial for health.
• It contains 0.2 to 0.3% pectin, which is anti-cancerous and also helps in lowering cholesterol.
• The peel of the Kinnow fruit contains oil which is used in cosmetics.
• It is a largely cultivated fruit of North India, and Punjab holds the major share of the Kinnow-producing area of the country, with other states including Rajasthan, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu, and Kashmir.
• It is popularly known as the “king of fruits” in Punjab.
• It has the ability to withstand soaring temperatures as high as 40°C during summer and 0°C during winter.

About Doctrine of Per Incuriam:

• The term "per incuriam," meaning 'through lack of care,' refers to judgements passed without reference to, or in ignorance of, a statute or an earlier judgement/precedent which would have beenrelevant and therefore affected the result of the case.
• As per legal principles, these judgements, which are decided based on incorrect interpretations of the law, may cause legal and practical issues.
• Therefore, they are not treated as binding precedent, and the courts often take steps to correct them.
• Since per incuriam decisions involve precedent, the doctrine bears a direct relation to the doctrine of “stare decisis” which translates to, ‘‘let the decision stand’’ or ‘‘to stand by that which is decided’’, and gives binding force to decisions of the courts.
• The doctrine is an exception to Article 141 of the Constitution of India, which embodies the precedents as a matter of law. However, this principle is applied only in exceptional cases.
• The present doctrine is strictly and rightly applicable to the maxim ratio decidendi, which is the point that determines the judgement and is binding in nature, and not to the obiter dicta i.e., a remark made during the course of the discussion having persuasive value.
• Case Laws:
  • In the State of Assam v. Ripa Sarma, it was held that when a judgement is pronounced in such a manner that is ignorant of earlier judgments of the court by either similar or larger benches, it would be per incuriam.
  • Recent Observations by the Supreme Court:
    • The Court held that a judgement may be treated as per incuriam when its ratio is irreconcilable with an earlier decision rendered by a bench of equal or larger strength or when a relevant statutory provision, rule, or regulation was not brought to the Court's attention.
    • It is not the numerical strength of judges taking a particular view that is relevant, but it is instead the strength of the bench, which is the determinative factor of the binding nature of a particular view.
    • The doctrine applies only to the binding reasoning (ratio decidendi) of a judgement and not to its observations (obiter dicta).
    • The judicial discipline requires a bench of co-equal strength that disagrees with an earlier decision to refer the matter to a larger bench rather than take a contrary view.
    • It also reiterated that a decision of a larger bench is binding on subsequent benches of equal or lesser strength.
    • The Court clarified that a judgement cannot be declared per incuriam merely because it reached an incorrect conclusion after considering an earlier precedent or because an alternative interpretation may suggest a conflict with prior decisions.

About Arrow-3 Missile Defence System:

• It is an exo-atmospheric anti-ballistic missile defence system for long-range threat engagement.
• It is designed with the ability to neutralise ballistic missiles before they re-enter the atmosphere.
• Arrow 3 is the latest interceptor for the Arrow Weapon System (AWS) jointly developed by Israel and the United States.
  •  AWS is the world’s first national, operational, and stand-alone Anti Tactical Ballistic Missiles (ATBM) defense system.
• Features:
  • It uses two-stage solid-fueled interceptors to engage short- and medium-range ballistic missiles and consists of a launcher, radar, and battle management system.
  • The missile fits in a 21-inch vertical launch tube and has an estimated flyout range of up to 2,400 km.
  • It can be launched earlier after threat detection and engage threats at higher altitudes outside the Earth’s atmosphere than previous interceptors.
  • It can intercept threats at an altitude of 100 km.
  • t is hypersonic, travelling five times the speed of sound.
  • It has early warning and fire control radar. It provides extended-range acquisition as well as multi-target acquisition and tracking capabilities.
• How does it work?
  • It uses hit-to-kill technology to destroy incoming missiles.
  • The missile is launched vertically, and then the direction is changed towards the estimated interception point.
  • The high-resolution electro-optical sensor acquires the target for the kill vehicle to hit the target and destroy the warhead.