Why in News?
A detailed report titled ‘Evaluation of Innovation Excellence Indicators of Public Funded R&D Organizations’ was released by the Office of the Principal Scientific Adviser, CII, and the Centre for Technology, Innovation, and Economic Research.
It aimed to assess the innovation outcomes and national contributions of public-funded R&D institutions in India.
What’s in Today’s Article?
- Scope of the Study
- Objective of the Study
- Methodology of the Study
- Key Findings of the Study
- Recommendations of the Report
- Conclusion
Scope of the Study:
- Institutions covered: 244 public-funded R&D organisations affiliated to various ministries.
- Excluded: Scientific institutions such as those belonging to -
- Defence research and development, space research, and atomic energy research - these make up the dominant share of India’s overall R&D spend.
- Academic institutions and universities.
- Rationale for exclusions:
- Sensitive nature of work in defence, atomic, and space domains.
- Academic institutions not included due to differing mandates.
Objective of the Study:
- Core purpose: To examine whether public-funded labs are:
- Engaged in academic (curiosity-driven) science,
- Or aligned with industry-driven innovations and product development.
- Broader goals:
- Contribute to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
- Align with National Missions (e.g., Deep Ocean Mission, National Quantum Mission).
- Support women scientists, skilling, and employment
- Guide labs to address socio-economic challenges.
Methodology of the Study:
- Survey format:
- Online questionnaire with 62 parameters.
- Labs/institutes self-select themselves as ‘Basic, Applied or Services’ or as ‘hybrid’ (if their research falls into more than one of the first three categories).
- All the data submitted by the labs/institutes was signed off by each lab director to ensure authenticity.
- Key parameters measured:
- Annual R&D expenditure.
- Share of young scientists.
- Number of patents and technologies developed.
- Participation of women scientists.
- Contributions to national missions.
- Collaboration with industry (domestic and international).
- Incubation support to startups.
Key Findings of the Study:
- Limited industry and startup engagement:
- Only 25% of the labs surveyed gave incubation support to startups.
- Merely 16% provided support to ‘deep tech’ startups.
- Just 15% collaborated with industry overseas.
- Access and openness: About 50% opened facilities to external researchers/students.
- Contribution to national missions:
- 50% contributed to ‘Make in India’.
- 35% aligned with Skill India.
- 30% targeting the Swachh Bharat.
- Human resource trends:
- Decline in permanent staff.
- Rise in contractual staff from 17,234 to 19,625.
- Young researchers' share increased from 54% to 58%.
- Women scientists' representation remained stagnant.
- Budget growth: The combined budget of 155 labs/institutes increased from ₹9,924 crore in 2017-18 to ₹13,162 crore in 2022-23.
Recommendations of the Report:
- Mandate realignment:
- All labs to review and align mandates with ‘Viksit Bharat’ vision.
- Prioritise critical technologies on a war footing.
- Strategic collaboration and capacity building: Strengthen partnerships with:
- Industry
- Startups
- Other R&D labs
- Higher Education Institutions
- Institutional reforms: Promote establishment of Section 8 Companies (nonprofit organisations established under the Companies Act, 2013) to -
- Provide support to startups,
- Open research and testing facilities, and,
- Improve cross-linkages with higher educational institutes.
Conclusion:
Strengthening public-funded R&D institutions through targeted innovation, industry collaboration, and alignment with national missions is essential to propel India towards its vision of Viksit Bharat.
With strategic reforms and inclusive participation, these institutions can become powerful engines driving sustainable development, technological self-reliance, and global scientific leadership.
