In News:

• How well states do on health indices does not seem to be directly correlated to how much they spend per capita on healthcare.
• This fact was highlighted by the recently-released National Health Accounts for 2018-19 for 20 large states.

What’s in Today’s Article:

• National Health Accounts
• News Summary

National Health Accounts

• National Health Accounts (NHA) provide financing information on health system which is very important for evidenced based policy making.
• It is a tool to describe health expenditures and the flow of funds in both Government and private sector in the country.
• It is published by the National Health Systems Resource Centre under the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare.
• NHA 2018-19 is the 6^th round of estimates in the series of annual Health Accounts for India.

News Summary

• The recently-released National Health Accounts for 2018-19 has revealed the fact that high per capita health spend is needed, but that alone is not enough.

Key highlights

• Decline in out-of-pocket expenditure
  • The NHA 2018-19 estimates show a continuous decline in out-of-pocket expenditure as a share of Total Health Expenditure (THE) from 64.2% to 48.2% between 2013-14 to 2018-19.
  • The report highlights that the Social Security Expenditure on health has also increased as a share of THE from 6% to 9.6% during this period
  • Government Health Expenditure as a share of THE has also increased from 28.6% to 40.6% between this period.
• Health spending of States/UTs
• 
• Health outcomes are not directly corelated to per capita spending by state
  • The report showed that J&K had indicators nearly as good as those of Kerala, Himachal or Maharashtra with less than half the spending.
  • Tamil Nadu too achieved similar outcomes with much lower expenditure.
  • It shows that often where total health expenditure is high, the bulk is borne by people out of their own pockets, as in Kerala and Maharashtra.
  • However, in Himachal and J&K, the government accounts for more than half the total spending on health and 47% in Tamil Nadu too.
• Spending is necessary, but spending alone is not sufficient
  • States with the least per capita spend — Bihar, MP and Assam in that order — have very poor health indices, which underlines that spending is necessary.
  • However, Bihar does better on most indices than many states with higher levels of spending, showing that spending alone is not sufficient.
• Government’s share in total health spending
  • It was highest in Uttarakhand at 61% and Assam at over 55%, while lowest in UP and Kerala at about 25%.
• Per capita spending
  • Per capita health spending is highest in Kerala, while lowest in Bihar.
• Increased public spending on health
  • Almost all states have increased public spending on health from abysmal levels in 2004-05.
  • Assam had the highest jump in share of public spending in the total health expenditure between 2004-05 and 2018.
  • J&K saw the lowest increase in this period.