Why in the News?
- The Union Health Ministry has released NFHS-6 fact sheets revealing notable gains in maternal care and child nutrition, but with a net reduction of 30 indicators, including critical metrics like anaemia, mortality, and sex ratio at birth.
What’s in Today’s Article?
- About NFHS (Background, Previous Surveys, etc.)
- Changes in NFHS-6 (Gains, Loses, Implications, Significance)
About NFHS
- The National Family Health Survey (NFHS) is a large-scale, multi-round household survey conducted by the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, with the International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS), Mumbai, as the nodal agency.
- It provides reliable data on population, health, and nutrition indicators.
- NFHS-4 (2015-16): Introduced district-level estimates and tablet-based digital interviewing, measuring 114 indicators.
- NFHS-5 (2019-21): Expanded to 131 key indicators, introducing new topics like preschool education, disability, and menstrual practices.
- NFHS-6 (2023-24): Covered nearly 6.8 lakh households across all states and UTs except Manipur.
- Historically, the NFHS has been additive by design, retaining previous questionnaires and adding new ones.
- However, NFHS-6 marks a departure, for the first time, the survey has subtracted overall.
What NFHS-6 Gained?
- NFHS-6 introduced several new dimensions:
- Direct Benefit Transfers (DBT)
- Self-Help Group (SHG) memberships
- Digital literacy
- Financial transactions
- Hepatitis-B and Hepatitis-C testing among women and men
- Dried blood spot collection from children aged 4-5 for Hepatitis-B testing
- Biological HIV testing has been brought back as part of clinical and biochemical testing
- Improvements in Key Indicators
- Mothers receiving at least 4 antenatal check-ups: Up about 7 percentage points from NFHS-5.
- Institutional births: Increased to 90.6% from 88.6%.
- Women's Internet use: Notable increase across states.
- Stunting among children under 5: Declined by over 6 percentage points, compared to under 3 percentage points between NFHS-4 and NFHS-5.
- Spousal violence: Dropped from 29.3% to 22.3%.
- Health insurance coverage in West Bengal rose from 33.7% to 88.2%, the largest increase.
- Women's Internet use in Andhra Pradesh jumped from 21% to 63.6%, the steepest rise.
- However, the share of women classified as overweight or obese increased in every state.
What NFHS-6 Lost?
- The preliminary fact sheet of NFHS-6 has only 101 indicators, compared to 131 in NFHS-5, a net reduction of 30 indicators (43 dropped, 13 added).
- Anaemia Dropped
- Anaemia had shown a worsening picture between NFHS-4 and NFHS-5:
- Children: 58.6% to 67.1%
- Women aged 15-49: 53.1% to 57%
- Pregnant women: 50.4% to 52.2%
- The rise was near-universal, with child anaemia increasing in 28 states/UTs despite the Anaemia Mukt Bharat campaign (2018).
- Why dropped? NFHS measured haemoglobin from a finger-prick blood sample read on a portable analyser, which several nutrition researchers argued overstated anaemia compared to venous blood drawn by other surveys.
- Replacement: Anaemia will now be tracked through the Diet and Biomarkers Survey, launched in December 2022 at the ICMR-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad. This survey uses venous blood instead of the finger-prick method and tracks obesity alongside anaemia for the first time. Data collection is complete but yet to be released.
- Mortality Indicators Removed
- Three mortality indicators have been cut:
- Neonatal mortality
- Infant mortality
- Under-five mortality
- These will now be tracked by the Sample Registration System (SRS), whose latest bulletin pegged infant mortality at 24 per 1,000 live births. However, SRS does not provide district-level data or socio-economic breakdowns available in NFHS.
- Sex Ratio Indicators Removed
- Both the sex ratio of the total population and the sex ratio at birth (929 females per 1,000 males in NFHS-5) are absent.
- This removes a key signal of sex-selective practices in the country.
- Sanitation and Clean Cooking Fuel Dropped
- Two indicators closely tied to flagship government programmes have been removed:
- Access to sanitation facilities: NFHS-5 recorded 70%, a measure linked to the Swachh Bharat Mission and the 2019 declaration of India as open defecation-free.
- Clean cooking fuel use: 58.6% in NFHS-5, a direct measure of the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana's success.
- Cancer Screening Indicators Gone
- Four cancer-screening indicators covering cervical, breast, and oral cancer, introduced for the first time in NFHS-5, have been dropped after a single round.
Implications of the Changes
- Data Gaps: The removals leave no current survey-based national figure for:
- Infant mortality with district-level breakdowns
- Sanitation coverage
- Sex ratio at birth
- Cancer screening rates
- Comprehensive HIV knowledge
- These are gaps that no other single source fills at the same scale.
- Concerns Over Programme Evaluation
- The removal of indicators tied to flagship schemes, sanitation, clean cooking fuel, anaemia, limits the ability to:
- Independently evaluate the effectiveness of programmes like Swachh Bharat Mission, Ujjwala Yojana, and Anaemia Mukt Bharat.
- Track district-level disparities that aggregate statistics cannot reveal.
- Identify socio-economic patterns in health outcomes.
- Trade-offs in Survey Design
- The shift represents a fundamental change in NFHS philosophy, moving from an additive design to a more selective approach.
- While this may reduce respondent burden and improve data quality, it also reduces the survey's role as a single comprehensive source of health and demographic data.
Significance of NFHS-6 Changes
- Methodological Improvements
- The dropping of finger-prick anaemia measurement in favour of venous blood methods reflects efforts to improve data accuracy.
- The reintroduction of biological HIV testing addresses a gap from NFHS-5.
- New Areas of Inquiry
- The addition of digital literacy, DBT, and SHG indicators acknowledges the changing landscape of welfare delivery and women's empowerment in India.
- Concerns Over Transparency
- The lack of a published rationale for many changes raises questions about:
- Transparency in survey design decisions.
- Consistency in measuring progress over time.
- Continuity of long-term data series critical for policy evaluation.