¯
Pesticides Management Bill, 2025
Jan. 11, 2026

Why in the News?

  • The Union government has released a revised draft of the Pesticides Management Bill, 2025 and invited public feedback to modernise India’s pesticide regulation regime.

What’s in Today’s Article?

  • Pesticide Regulation (Background, Overview of Draft Bill, Institutional Architecture, Role of State Government, Key Gaps & Concerns, Way Forward)

Background: Pesticide Regulation in India

  • India’s pesticide regulation is currently governed by the Insecticides Act, 1968 and its accompanying rules, framed over five decades ago.
  • This framework was designed at a time when chemical pest control was central to agricultural productivity, with limited awareness of environmental and health externalities. Over time, concerns have emerged regarding:
    • Rising incidents of spurious and substandard pesticides
    • Human health impacts, including farmer exposure and poisoning
    • Environmental damage, especially contamination of soil and water bodies
    • Weak enforcement and outdated regulatory mechanisms
  • Recognising these challenges, successive governments have attempted to introduce comprehensive legislation to replace the Insecticides Act.
  • Draft Bills were introduced in 2008, 2018, and 2020, but none could be enacted into law.

Overview of the Pesticides Management Bill, 2025

  • The Pesticides Management Bill, 2025, is the latest attempt to overhaul India’s pesticide governance framework.
  • It aims to regulate the manufacture, import, export, storage, sale, distribution, and use of pesticides in the country. Key stated objectives of the Bill include:
    • Minimising risks to human beings, animals, and the environment
    • Ensuring safe and effective use of pesticides
    • Promoting transparency, traceability, and accountability
    • Improving service delivery to farmers and enhancing ease of living
  • The Bill proposes to repeal the Insecticides Act, 1968, thereby consolidating pesticide regulation under a modern legislative framework.

Institutional Architecture Under the Bill

  • Registration Committee
    • The Bill provides for a committee constituted by the Union government. It includes representatives from:
      • Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR)
      • Drugs Controller General of India
      • Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change
      • Department of Chemicals and Petrochemicals
      • A national-level toxicology research institution
    • This Committee is responsible for the registration of pesticides, reviewing safety concerns and examining temporary bans imposed by States
  • Central Pesticides Board
    • A Central Pesticides Board is also envisaged to:
      • Recommend pesticides for inclusion under the law
      • Prescribe good manufacturing practices
      • Frame protocols for pesticide recall
      • Develop standard operating procedures for poisoning cases
      • Lay down guidelines for the safe disposal of pesticides and packaging

Role of State Governments

  • Under the proposed Bill, State governments have limited regulatory powers. They may:
    • Temporarily prohibit the sale, distribution, or use of a pesticide or a specific batch
    • Impose such a prohibition for a maximum period of one year
  • However, any such notification must be reviewed by the Registration Committee, and States do not have independent long-term prohibition or punitive powers.
  • This aspect has attracted criticism from experts and civil society groups.

Key Gaps and Concerns in the 2025 Draft

  • Despite being labelled as a revised version, the 2025 draft introduces limited substantive changes compared to the 2020 draft. Major concerns include:
    • Weakened legislative language: The Bill states it will “strive to minimise risk” instead of committing to “minimise risk”.
    • Absence of criminal liability provisions: There are no clear provisions fixing criminal liability on manufacturers or distributors in cases of misuse, poisoning, or environmental damage.
    • Limited State enforcement powers: States cannot permanently ban hazardous pesticides.
    • No price regulation mechanism: The Bill does not address high pesticide pricing or farmer affordability.
    • Weak grievance redressal framework: Clear compensation and liability mechanisms for affected farmers are missing.
  • Experts argue that without strong enforcement and accountability, regulatory effectiveness may remain limited.

Consultation Process and Way Forward

  • The government has invited public comments and stakeholder feedback on the draft Bill until February 2, 2026.
  • This consultation phase is crucial given the Bill’s long legislative history and the persistent concerns raised by farmer groups, public health experts, and environmental organisations.
  • The Bill also aligns with broader policy goals such as:
    • Encouraging biological and traditional pest control methods
    • Reducing dependence on hazardous chemical pesticides
    • Strengthening farmer confidence through regulatory transparency

Enquire Now