Why in the News?

• The Supreme Court has expanded paid maternity leave for adoptive mothers, striking down restrictive provisions in the Social Security Code, 2020.

What’s in Today’s Article?

• Maternity Leave (Framework, Court Judgement, Legal Changes, Rationale Behind the Judgement, Limitations of Earlier Law, Impact, Significance of the Judgement, etc.)

Maternity Leave Framework in India

• India’s maternity benefit framework has evolved over time to support working women and child welfare.

• The Maternity Benefit Act, 1961, provided 12 weeks of paid leave.
• The 2017 Amendment increased leave for biological mothers to 26 weeks.
• It also introduced maternity leave for adoptive and surrogate mothers, but with conditions.

• Under Section 5(4) of the Act (later Section 60(4) of the Social Security Code, 2020), adoptive mothers were entitled to 12 weeks of leave only if the child was below three months of age.
• This created a distinction between biological and adoptive motherhood in law.

Supreme Court Judgment and Legal Changes

• The Supreme Court struck down the restrictive provision limiting maternity leave for adoptive mothers.
• Adoptive mothers are now entitled to 12 weeks of paid maternity leave regardless of the child’s age at adoption.
• The Court held that such restrictions violate principles of equality and child welfare.
• The judgment recognises adoptive mothers as having the same rights and responsibilities as biological mothers.

Rationale Behind the Judgment

• The Court’s reasoning reflects a broader and more inclusive understanding of motherhood.
• Beyond Biological Definitions
  • The Court stated that motherhood cannot be viewed through a “narrow lens of biology” and must include adoptive relationships.
• Child-Centric Approach

• Adopted children often face emotional and psychological challenges.
• The initial bonding period is critical for their development.
• The Court noted that children raised in institutional settings may have higher stress levels, requiring greater parental care after adoption.

• Right to Reproductive Autonomy
  • Adoption was recognised as part of an individual’s reproductive choices, linking the judgment to broader constitutional rights.

Limitations of the Earlier Law

• The earlier provision was considered inadequate for several reasons:

• The three-month age limit excluded most adoptive parents
• Adoption procedures in India often take longer than three months
• Data showed that less than 5% of adopted children were below three months of age

• As a result, many adoptive mothers were effectively denied maternity benefits.

Impact of the Judgment

• Greater Inclusivity: The judgment ensures equal treatment of adoptive and biological mothers under labour laws.
• Improved Child Welfare: Adequate maternity leave allows adoptive parents to:

• Build emotional bonds
• Support child development
• Provide a stable home environment

• Support for Working Women: The decision reduces the conflict between career and caregiving responsibilities for adoptive mothers.

Court’s Observations on Parenthood

• The Supreme Court emphasised that parenting responsibilities should not be viewed as solely maternal.

• It highlighted the importance of shared parenting
• Recognised the role of fathers in childcare

• The Court recommended that the Union government consider a formal legal framework for paternity leave.

Status of Paternity Leave in India

• Currently, male government employees are entitled to 15 days of paternity leave.
• In the private sector, policies vary across organisations.
• There is no comprehensive national law governing paternity leave, leading to uneven benefits.

Significance of the Judgment

• Constitutional Values: The judgment strengthens principles of Equality (Article 14) and Dignity & autonomy.
• Gender Justice: By recognising shared parenting, it moves toward a more gender-balanced framework.
• Labour Law Reform: It highlights gaps in India’s labour laws and the need for modern, inclusive policies.