¯
The INO that wasn’t and the JUNO that is
Nov. 27, 2025

Context

  • The completion of China’s Jiangmen Underground Neutrino Observatory (JUNO) marks a major milestone in global particle physics, but for India it carries a bittersweet resonance.
  • While China releases its first scientific results, the India-based Neutrino Observatory (INO) remains stalled.
  • The contrast between the two projects reveals differing national trajectories in Big Science, shaped by public trust, administrative foresight, and political conditions.

The Promise of Underground Neutrino Experiments

  • Neutrinos are among the most elusive particles in the universe.
  • Their ability to pass through matter almost entirely unhindered requires immense underground detectors shielded from background noise.
  • Both JUNO and INO were designed to study neutrino oscillations and determine the neutrino mass ordering, one of the most important open questions in modern physics.
  • While JUNO has reached completion after a delay, INO’s progress has stagnated.
  • JUNO’s success reflects sustained national commitment, whereas INO illustrates how scientific potential can be derailed by administrative missteps and sociopolitical conflict.

The Stalling of INO

  • INO’s ambitious 50-kilotonne detector demanded installation inside a mountain in Theni, Tamil Nadu, using natural rock as shielding.
  • However, the combination of large-scale excavation, involvement of the Department of Atomic Energy, and political mobilisation sparked local fears.
  • The project suffered from:
    • Insufficient early community engagement
    • Unanticipated environmental and social sensitivities
    • Bureaucratic delays and litigation
  • These failures coincided with China’s rapid progress, reducing INO’s ability to attract international collaboration and funding.

JUNO’s Advancement

  • JUNO’s first scientific papers showcase its technological sophistication and a broad global collaboration involving many countries.
  • The absence of Indian researchers is striking, considering India’s longstanding contributions to neutrino physics.
  • JUNO has already produced a high-precision measurement of θ₁₂, one of the key parameters governing neutrino oscillations.
  • This places JUNO in a strong position to determine the neutrino mass hierarchy and explore physics beyond the Standard Model.
  • As JUNO spokesperson Yifang Wang stated, the project is poised for transformative discoveries.

Consequences of Missing the Moment

  • INO’s stagnation shows that in frontier science, missing one opportunity can mean missing an entire generation of discovery.
  • The next major questions in neutrino physics will require:
    • More specialised technology
    • Greater international cooperation
    • Larger financial commitments
  • Without renewed investment in scientific infrastructure, India risks losing its place in the global pursuit of fundamental physics.
  • Yet optimism persists. India’s young scientists are skilled, creative, and ambitious. What they need is a supporting system that matches their potential, administratively, politically, and socially.

The Way Forward: Rethinking Readiness for Big Science

  • Large-scale scientific initiatives rely not only on technical expertise but also on the ecosystems around them.
  • Successful Big Science requires:
    • Regulatory clarity
    • Environmental responsibility
    • Transparent communication
    • Community participation
  • Citing resource constraints often masks deeper issues. India already operates major observatories and conservation projects, showing that capability is not the problem, coordination and planning are. 

Conclusion

  • The stories of JUNO and INO highlight how nations shape their scientific futures.
  • China’s persistence has led to a world-leading neutrino experiment, while India’s project remains entangled in avoidable obstacles.
  • Recovering from this setback demands that India strengthen public engagement, long-term planning, and administrative agility.
  • India’s scientific talent is undeniable but the challenge now is ensuring that national systems, political, bureaucratic, social, and infrastructural, rise to support that talent so the country can participate fully in the next era of fundamental scientific discovery.

Enquire Now