Trump’s New Travel Ban on 12 Countries
June 6, 2025

Why in News?

President Donald Trump, nearly five months into his second term, signed a new travel ban restricting entry from 12 countries and limiting visas for seven others.

Aimed at reviving his earlier immigration agenda, the ban is intended to curb a possible surge in immigration. It will take effect at 12:01 am on June 9.

What’s in Today’s Article?

  • Travel Ban
  • New Travel Ban Under Trump
  • Precedents to the Travel Ban
  • Current Ban Is Different

Travel Ban

  • A travel ban is a U.S. federal policy that restricts or prohibits nationals from specific countries from entering the country.
  • It may involve full entry bans or limitations on certain visa categories.
  • Trump’s Revived Policy
    • President Trump’s latest order revives his first-term travel ban, with five previously affected countries reappearing in the new list.
  • Reason Behind the New Ban
    • The new ban follows a deadly attack in Boulder, Colorado, allegedly by an Egyptian national.
    • Though Egypt is not on the list, Trump used the incident to highlight the dangers of visa overstays and inadequate screening from certain countries.

New Travel Ban Under Trump

  • The travel ban fully restricts entry for citizens from 12 countries. Partial restrictions apply to travelers from 7 Countries.
  • Purpose of the Ban
    • The ban aims to encourage cooperation with each listed country, considering their “unique circumstances.”
    • Countries may negotiate with the U.S. to ease restrictions, following a process similar to Trump’s trade negotiations.
  • Criteria for Inclusion
    • Countries were included based on:
      • Inadequate screening and vetting procedures
      • High visa overstay rates
      • Presence of terrorist actors or support for terrorism
      • Refusal to accept deported nationals
  • Specific Allegations
    • Iran and Cuba: Labeled state sponsors of terrorism
    • Somalia: Called a terrorist safe haven
    • Afghanistan: Identified as being controlled by the Taliban, a designated global terrorist group
    • Haiti: Accused of sending “hundreds of thousands” of illegal migrants.
      • Trump and VP JD Vance also made controversial and unverified claims about immigrants abducting pets.
  • Exemptions
    • The ban does not apply to:
      • Current visa holders
      • U.S. permanent residents
      • Dual nationals of banned countries traveling on a non-restricted passport

Precedents to the Travel Ban

  • 2016 Campaign Rhetoric: Donald Trump called for a Muslim ban and a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the U.S., using inflammatory language such as Islam hates us.
  • First Ban (January 2017): Banned citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries (Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Yemen) for 90 days. It was overturned by a federal judge within a month.
  • Second Ban (March 2017): Exempted green card and visa holders. Also blocked by federal judges.
  • Third Ban (September 2017): Included Chad, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Syria, Venezuela, Yemen. Upheld by the Supreme Court in June 2018. Chad was later removed after cooperation with the U.S.
  • Fourth Ban (January 2020): Targeted immigrants (not tourists) from Eritrea, Kyrgyzstan, Myanmar, Nigeria, Sudan, and Tanzania.
  • Biden's Repeal (2021): President Joe Biden repealed all previous bans, calling them “a stain on our national conscience.”

Current Ban Is Different

  • Broader Anti-Immigration Context
    • Comes alongside Trump's wider immigration crackdown in his second term—declaring a national emergency at the southern border, denying asylum, conducting raids, and limiting student admissions.
  • Administrative Framing
    • Unlike earlier bans, this one does not explicitly target Muslim-majority nations.
    • Instead, it cites national security, overstay rates, terrorism links, and lack of cooperation from foreign governments.
  • Legally More Cautious
    • Legal experts suggest this ban is more likely to survive legal scrutiny.
    • The delay in announcement suggests internal deliberation to bolster its legal standing.
  • Focus on Implementation
    • Experts warn the legality may ultimately depend on how fairly and consistently the policy is enforced.

Enquire Now