Why Scrutiny of Lower Fertility Rates Is Not the Answer to the Delimitation Crisis
Dec. 4, 2024

Context

  • India's population dynamics remain a focal point of discussion, particularly with the prospect of the Census being conducted next year and the subsequent delimitation of parliamentary seats.
  • Recent remarks by the Chief Ministers of Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu, advocating for increased birth rates to avoid political disadvantages, reflect underlying concerns about the implications of population growth on representation and resource allocation.
  • While such statements might not be serious policy recommendations, they highlight the complexities of balancing demographic trends with political and economic imperatives.

Population Growth, Political Representation and Resource Allocation

  • Population Growth and Political Representation
    • India’s federal structure amplifies the political consequences of population growth disparities among states.
    • The delimitation of parliamentary constituencies, which determines the representation of states in Parliament, has been frozen since 1976 to prevent penalizing states that have successfully reduced their fertility rates.
    • This freeze, extended in 2001 for another 25 years, aims to maintain fairness.
    • However, as the freeze approaches its end, debates emerge on whether to extend it further or explore alternative electoral systems, such as allocating seats based on vote share.
    • While the latter option may seem innovative, it faces feasibility challenges and questions about its appropriateness.
    • For now, extending the freeze appears to be the most pragmatic solution, maintaining the political balance and rewarding states that have worked toward stabilizing their populations.
  • Population and Resource Allocation
    • Population figures significantly influence the distribution of central resources to states.
    • Historically, the Finance Commission used the 1971 population figures for its calculations, aligning with the delimitation freeze.
    • However, the 14th and 15th Finance Commissions shifted to using current population data, introducing a compensatory variable called demographic change.
    • This measure accounts for efforts made by states in reducing fertility rates, striking a balance in resource allocation.
    • For instance, under the 15th Finance Commission, population was given a weight of 15%, while demographic change received 12.5%, ensuring fairness to progressive states.

Necessary Measures to Mitigate Population Disparity Among States

  • Addressing Economic Disparity
    • Economic disparities among Indian states with varying population growth rates represent a significant challenge to national development and cohesion.
    • States with high population growth often face lagging economic development, exacerbating inequality and fuelling regional tensions.
    • Bridging this gap requires a multi-faceted approach that focuses on creating inclusive economic growth, improving infrastructure, and addressing systemic disadvantages in underperforming regions.
  • Aspirational Districts Programme
    • One of the key strategies for addressing these disparities is to enhance the effectiveness of targeted development initiatives.
    • The Aspirational Districts Programme, for instance, focuses on improving socioeconomic indicators in the most backward districts by prioritizing health, education, and infrastructure.
    • While this initiative has made progress, its impact can be amplified through better monitoring, increased funding, and integration with other development programs.
    • A tailored approach that considers the unique challenges of each district, such as geography, resource availability, and demographic trends, is essential for sustainable progress.
  • Infrastructure Development
    • Investments in infrastructure development are also crucial. Many states with high population growth rates lack adequate infrastructure, hindering industrialisation and economic diversification.
    • By prioritising investments in roads, railways, power supply, and digital connectivity, the government can create a conducive environment for businesses to thrive.
    • This, in turn, can attract private investment, create jobs, and stimulate local economies.
    • Special economic zones (SEZs) and industrial corridors in these regions could further accelerate development and reduce economic disparities.
  • Education and Skill Development
    • States with high population growth often have lower levels of literacy and skill attainment, limiting their workforce's ability to participate in modern industries.
    • Expanding access to quality education, vocational training, and skill-building programs tailored to local economies can significantly uplift these regions.
    • Initiatives such as the Skill India Mission should prioritise states with lagging development to prepare their workforce for emerging opportunities in sectors like technology, manufacturing, and services.
  • Agricultural Innovation
    • Additionally, developing agricultural innovation is critical for states where a significant portion of the population depends on agriculture.
    • Providing access to modern farming techniques, irrigation systems, and market linkages can enhance productivity and incomes for rural households.
    • Promoting diversification into high-value crops and agro-industries can also create additional employment opportunities.
  • Collaboration between Centre and States
    • Collaboration between the central and state governments is vital in formulating and implementing these strategies.
    • States need greater autonomy in designing development programs while receiving adequate financial and technical support from the central government.
    • A robust monitoring mechanism that evaluates the impact of these initiatives in real-time can ensure accountability and enable timely course corrections.

The Role of Finance Commission in Addressing the Economic Disparity

  • The Finance Commission plays a critical role in addressing disparities through resource allocation.
  • By incorporating variables such as demographic change alongside population figures, it has made strides in incentivising states that have effectively controlled their fertility rates.
  • However, more dynamic resource allocation frameworks could be designed to address the specific needs of states with high population growth.
  • For example, allocating funds for skill development programs, small-scale industry promotion, and agricultural modernisation could directly enhance economic opportunities in these regions.

Way Forward

  • A Multi-Pronged Approach
    • India's population is projected to peak at 170 crores by 2070 before declining.
    • Currently, the Total Fertility Rate (TFR) nationwide stands at 2, just below the replacement rate of 2.1.
    • However, significant disparities exist among states, with TFRs ranging from 1.5 to 3.
    • Efforts to harmonise these rates must focus on reducing high TFRs rather than increasing low ones.
    • Encouraging higher fertility in low-TFR states is counterproductive, given India's overpopulation and the economic challenges it already faces.
  • Accelerate Fertility Decline in High-TFR States
    • The priority should be to accelerate fertility decline in high-TFR states through two key strategies: empowering women and improving reproductive health services.
    • Empowering women reduces the demand for large families, while better reproductive health services enable couples to achieve their desired family size.
    • Notably, only five states currently have a TFR above 2.1, making targeted interventions feasible and impactful.
  • Towards Harmonious Relations
    • Large socioeconomic disparities among states with varying population growth rates pose risks to national harmony.
    • Addressing these differences requires a multi-pronged approach that combines political, economic, and social measures.
    • Extending the delimitation freeze, refining resource allocation criteria, promoting economic development in lagging states, and reducing fertility rates in high-TFR regions are all essential components of a comprehensive response.

Conclusion

  • India's demographic transition presents both challenges and opportunities.
  • By adopting thoughtful and equitable policies, the nation can navigate these complexities and ensure balanced development that benefits all its citizens.
  • Success in managing population growth must be celebrated, not penalised, as a cornerstone of sustainable progress.