Mains Daily Question
Jan. 17, 2024
Q.2 Though the Constitution of India establishes an integrated judicial system with the Supreme Court at the top, the High Courts are not subordinate to it. Discuss the constitutional distribution of powers between the Supreme Court and the High Courts in the light of the above statement. (10 Marks, 150 Words)
Approach: Introduction: Introduce by highlighting the hierarchical structure of the Indian judiciary and substantiate the reasons why the High Courts are not subordinate to the Supreme Court. Body: Discuss the constitutional distribution of powers between the Supreme Court and the High Courts, highlighting their respective jurisdictions, roles, and independence within the judicial framework. Conclusion: Conclude by stating the significance of the High Courts as independent entities within the overall hierarchy |
Answer:
The judicial system in India follows a hierarchical structure, with the Supreme Court of India at the top of the judicial pyramid, the High Courts below them and subordinate courts (i.e. district courts and other lower courts) at the base.
However, the High Courts are not ‘subordinate’ to the Supreme Court because:
- A judge of a High Court can only be removed by the Parliament of India in the same manner and on the same grounds as a judge of the Supreme Court.
- The writ jurisdiction of the High Courts (Article 226) is wider than the writ jurisdiction of the Supreme Court (Article 32).
The constitutional distribution of powers can be summarized as:
Supreme Court of India
|
High Courts in India
|
Thus, as recently reiterated by the Supreme Court of India in the Shankar Kumar Jha vs. The State of Bihar and Ors., the High Courts in India are ‘Constitutional Courts’ and are not subordinate to the Supreme Court. Therefore, for a proper and effective functioning of the judicial system, a rational oversight mechanism must be adopted by the Supreme Court of India in order to ensure the ‘constitutional’ status of both the courts.