Context:
- India, once the world's leading textile producer and exporter, currently accounts for only about 3% of the global apparel export market, despite possessing a fully integrated textile value chain.
- India's aspiration of achieving $100 billion in textile and apparel (T&A) exports by 2030 requires not just incentives but a robust institutional ecosystem that strengthens scale, productivity, finance, labour, logistics and trade facilitation.
India’s Historical Textile Legacy:
- India has been a global textile powerhouse since the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC), with archaeological evidence of spinning, weaving and dyeing dating back nearly 4,500 years.
- Key historical milestones:
- Indian cotton fabrics were traded across Asia and Europe.
- Dhaka muslin, Murshidabad silk, and fine cotton textiles became globally renowned.
- Around 1700, India contributed nearly one-fourth of global economic output, largely driven by textiles.
- The Industrial Revolution in Britain shifted competitiveness from artisanal craftsmanship to mechanised production, resulting in India's decline in textile exports.
Current Status - Strong Capabilities, Weak Global Presence:
- India possesses an integrated textile value chain, covering cotton production, spinning, weaving, processing, garment manufacturing, and exports. However, its share in global apparel exports remains stagnant.
- For example, China’s global apparel market share in 2024 was 29.4%, Bangladesh (9.2%), Vietnam (6.4%), and India (3.0%).
- Although the global apparel market exceeds USD 520 billion, India's participation remains disproportionately low.
Why the Apparel Sector Matters?
- This highlights apparel manufacturing as a strategic sector because of its high employment intensity.
- Employment generation for every ₹1 crore invested in the apparel sector creates 153 jobs, automobiles create 27 jobs, and steel creates 14 jobs.
- Thus, apparel manufacturing is particularly valuable for labour-intensive industrialisation, women's employment, rural-to-urban workforce transition, and inclusive economic growth.
Lessons from Successful Exporters:
- China: Developed vertically integrated textile clusters, provided concessional finance, ensured policy stability, and created globally competitive manufacturing ecosystems.
- Bangladesh: Benefited from Least Developed Country (LDC) trade preferences, supported exporters through RMG (readymade garment)-specific finance, and developed export processing zones.
- Vietnam: Leveraged foreign investment. Established industrial parks. Signed multiple Free Trade Agreements (FTAs). Built strong industry-academia linkages.
- Common lesson: Every successful exporter created institutions that enabled firms to compete at scale.
Major Challenges Before India:
- Undervalued currency advantage elsewhere: Countries like China enjoy an implicit export advantage due to relatively undervalued currencies, making their exports more competitive.
- Missing "middle" in manufacturing: India lacks mid-sized export-oriented firms capable of handling large export orders, delivering quickly, and achieving economies of scale. This remains a major structural weakness.
- Fibre mix imbalance:
- Global apparel demand increasingly favours man-made fibres (MMF). For example, global consumption (Cotton: Non-cotton) is 25: 75, while India’s is 60: 40.
- This limits India's participation in rapidly expanding segments such as activewear, technical textiles, and athleisure.
- Although customs duties on MMF have been rationalised, complementary investments in spinning and weaving remain inadequate.
- High cost of capital: Real interest rates -India (6.2–8.2%), China (~1.3%), Vietnam (~1%), and Bangladesh (negative real interest rates). Higher financing costs reduce export competitiveness.
- GST refund delays: Delays in GST refunds, and export incentive disbursals create liquidity constraints for exporters.
- Labour challenges:
- The apparel industry depends heavily on migrant labour from states such as Bihar, Odisha, and Jharkhand.
- Key concerns include seasonal migration, high worker attrition; festival absenteeism; and labour shortages in manufacturing clusters like Bengaluru, Tiruppur and Surat.
- There is the need to expand production into regions with abundant labour, such as Bihar, following examples like Pearl Global's Muzaffarpur unit.
- Low female labour force participation: Greater female workforce participation could reduce labour shortages, support labour-intensive manufacturing, and enhance inclusive growth.
- Trade competitiveness:
- The recently concluded India–UK Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) and the EU–India FTA negotiations improve market access. However, tariff reductions alone are insufficient.
- India must also improve end-to-end logistics, customs efficiency, documentation, digital approvals, supply chain predictability, and compliance processes.
Way Forward - Build Institutions, Not Just Incentives:
- India needs a whole-of-ecosystem approach rather than isolated policy interventions.
- Priority reforms:
- Strengthen PM MITRA (Mega Integrated Textile Region and Apparel) Parks.
- Develop globally competitive textile clusters.
- Expand manufacturing scale.
- Improve logistics and port connectivity.
- Lower financing costs.
- Accelerate GST refunds.
- Promote MMF and technical textiles.
- Encourage investment in spinning, weaving and processing.
- Improve labour skilling and mobility.
- Increase female labour force participation.
- Create digitally enabled and predictable trade facilitation systems.
- Integrate finance, infrastructure, institutions, skills and market access into a unified industrial strategy.
Conclusion:
- India possesses the historical legacy, raw material base and integrated value chain required to become a global textile leader once again. Yet history alone cannot secure future competitiveness.
- With structural reforms implemented with urgency, India can reposition itself as a leading global apparel sourcing hub and significantly expand its share in global value chains.