¯
The United Nations’ Long Road to Restoring Trust
Sept. 30, 2026

Context

  • The United Nations (UN) was established after the Second World War to create predictability, dialogue and rules in international relations.
  • In a world historically marked by mistrust and conflict, it provided an institutional framework for diplomacy, international law and collective action.
  • However, its effectiveness increasingly depends on restoring trust among member states and global citizens.
  • The 81st UN General Assembly's theme, Restoring Trust, Managing Transformation: a UN that delivers for all, reflects concerns over the organisation's effectiveness, accountability and representativeness.

Surveys about the UN

  • A UN Foundation poll found that 52% of respondents believed the organisation was struggling to deliver results and supported deep structural reform.
  • More than half felt that the UN struggled to enforce international law and protect human rights and was dominated by powerful countries.
  • Another poll found that only 58% believed the UN could lead efforts to solve global problems. Several factors explain this erosion of confidence.

Reasons Behind Erosion of Confidence

  • Security Council Deadlock
    • The deadlock has weakened faith in collective international action.
    • The frequent use of the veto by permanent members can prevent decisive responses to crises.
    • The General Assembly's requirement that permanent members explain their vetoes reflects growing dissatisfaction with this imbalance.
  • Concerns over Institutional Accountability
    • Problems involving recruitment, procurement, resource allocation and peacekeeper misconduct reveal weaknesses in oversight.
    • Punishing individuals without addressing systemic failures creates doubts about the organisation's commitment to accountability.
  • Excessive Dependence on Financially Powerful States
    • It raises concerns about the neutrality and independence of UN institutions.
    • Financial contributions can translate into disproportionate influence within the UN system. Wealthier countries may shape recruitment, programme funding and institutional priorities.
    • Heavy dependence on particular donors can create doubts about whether recommendations to developing countries are completely neutral.
    • Financial dependence may also encourage bureaucratic risk aversion, particularly when officials fear upsetting powerful contributors.
    • Greater transparency in programme expenditure is therefore essential, especially for citizens of beneficiary countries.
  • Unequal Representation
    • Developing countries constitute about 84% of the world's population but hold only 44% of UN civil-service leadership positions.
    • This creates a disconnect between where the UN delivers programmes and where institutional power is concentrated.
    • Greater participation of the Global South in leadership, decision-making and institutional locations would make the UN more representative.

The Way Forward

  • Reverse the shrinking space
    • Despite its shortcomings, the UN remains a major provider of humanitarian assistance.
    • It delivered humanitarian assistance and protection to approximately 98 million people in 2025–26, demonstrating its continuing importance.
    • However, questions remain regarding aid effectiveness and the role of local actors in programme delivery.
    • In conflicts such as Ukraine, Gaza and Iran, the UN has undertaken tactical interventions to address humanitarian and environmental risks.
    • Yet such interventions have not consistently developed into sustained peacebuilding and dialogue between belligerents.
    • One concern is the excessive centralisation of peace-making.
    • Greater authority for regional offices, field personnel and local actors could allow the UN to identify opportunities for dialogue more rapidly and develop context-specific peace initiatives.
  • Restoring Trust, Funding Arrangements, Equal Representation
    • Restoring trust requires greater transparency, stronger oversight and meaningful accountability.
    • Recruitment, procurement and resource allocation must become more open and independently scrutinised.
    • Funding arrangements should reduce excessive dependence on individual donors.
    • The UN must also address the representation deficit of the Global South and give developing countries greater influence in leadership and decision-making.
    • Local communities and organisations should receive a larger role in humanitarian and development programmes.
    • Finally, the organisation should strengthen preventive diplomacy, decentralised peacebuilding and conflict mediation.
    • Its credibility will increasingly depend on its ability to convert humanitarian interventions into sustained political dialogue.

Conclusion

  • The UN's trust deficit reflects concerns over effectiveness, accountability and representation.
  • Yet declining confidence makes institutional renewal more necessary, not less.
  • The organisation remains humanity's most important framework for replacing unilateral power politics with rules-based international cooperation.
  • The transformation envisaged by the 81st General Assembly must therefore begin with restoring institutional trust.
  • A more transparent, representative, accountable and responsive UN can better serve global citizens and strengthen the foundations of international peace and cooperation.

Enquire Now